Well, I have spent the better part of the past 2 days perusing the various media outlets. I have watched the video of the Gibson interview with Sarah Palin several times. I also found the actual transcripts of the interview and saw how it was edited to make Sarah look like she was: "At times visibly nervous . . . Ms. Palin most visibly stumbled when she was asked by Mr. Gibson if she agreed with the Bush doctrine. Ms. Palin did not seem to know what he was talking about. Mr. Gibson, sounding like an impatient teacher, informed her that it meant the right of 'anticipatory self-defense.' " -- New York Times, Sept. 12
"The New York Times got it wrong. And Charlie Gibson got it wrong. There is no single meaning of the Bush doctrine. In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration -- and the one Charlie Gibson cited is not the one in common usage today". Charles Krauthammer Saturday, September 13, 2008 and he should know according to Wikipedia
I thought that the only truly biased networks were MSNBC & its parent company NBC, but now I know that ALL MAIN STREAM MEDIA is in the tank for Obama!! I have NEVER seen Obama hammered like Gibson did Sarah Palin. Granted, she doesn't have the hardened cynicism of the likes of Joe Biden with 28 years in the senate where he voted 96.6% the same way as his party. And she isn't like the forked tongued, right in your face deceptive B. Hussein Obama. She is a new face on the national scene, but her approval rating in Alaska is over 80%, compared to the 9% approval rating of Congress I'd say she is doing her job a lot better than they are!! It strikes me as unnerving that there has become such scrutiny of Gov. Palin, her family, and her background. Yet no one has ever questioned Obama about his associations, and I don't mean Ayers, and Wright. What about Frank Marshall Davis? The mysterious "Frank" from his book "Dreams from my Father", was his childhood mentor and father figure. Frank was a member of the Communist Party USA, and a subversive wanted by the FBI. BO sat at his feet and listened to his stories. And who in the media has asked the Obama's about "Public Allies"? It's just a little organization that Michelle was executive director of in 1993. Oh yeah, it sounds like a great "Service Organization" on its website, and BO even alludes to it on his website as the model for his "National Service Corps". Problem is folks, and I know some of you BO groupies are too young to even know what I'm about to say, this is all radical, socialist, Marxist rhetoric learned at the feet of Frank Marshall Davis. And one more player is "Saul Alinsky". Good 'ole Saul wrote "Rules for Radicals" in 1971, it is out of print, but you can find chapters of it reprinted on various web sites. B. Hussein Obama is following his plan to gain wide eyed, bushy tailed followers to a T. Our Public Universities have been preaching radical socialism for years. Look at University of Colorado's Ward Churchill, Churchill, in an essay after the Sept. 11 attacks, compared the victims who died at New York City's World Trade Center to the Nazi regime's functionaries. The MSM has become the outlet for the Liberal Elite and now their mission is to take down any opposition to their "Chosen One".
"Many Democrats are clearly itching for the Illinois senator to go at Palin in a meaningful way. The liberal base of the Democratic party detests Palin in a visceral way and wants to destroy her, regardless of whether it is a sound political strategy or not," " Chris Cillizza, author of washingtonpost.com's political blog, The Fix. Even newspapers across the pond have to get their two cents worth in. "John McCain is a boring, warmongering has-been, but Sarah Palin has been the real outrage. How could the greatest power on earth allow this untravelled, snow-flecked, ex-beauty queen, stained with the blood of moose, born again in the Lord, with her teeming family of children with names that sound like dogs, near the nuclear button? According to The TELEGRAPH.co.uk
There are so many websites that have popped up overnight because everyone wants to get in on the act. Ask yourself WHY? Why does the Obama camp need people attacking Sarah Palin, and making up lies, and distorting the truth about her? When you see someone taking down Sarah Palin, ask yourself why? Why hasn't Obama, with everything going for him, been able to seal the deal? It's because most Americans have a feeling in their gut that something just isn't right about this guy, and it has nothing to do with race.