Showing posts with label Mainstream Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mainstream Media. Show all posts

January 14, 2012

The News of the Week

   It has been quite a week on the Republican Primary Campaign trail. Mitt Romney wins New Hampshire and Capitalism is put on trial by his rivals, Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry. Wow! The liberal media sure loves this turn of events.

An Iranian nuclear scientist is killed by a bomb placed under his car and President Obama condems the action (hmm, doth he protest too much?) in a message sent to the spiritual leader of Iran, Seyyed Ali Khomenei. I thought we didn't have any open lines of communication with State sponsored Terrorist countries. I wonder how he pulled that one off.

The "Campaigner-in Chief" decides he needs more executive power from Congress to consolidate 6 government agencies into 1. Election year politics, or a genuine concern about government inefficiency? You decide. Oh, and we need to raise the debt ceiling again by 1.2 Trillion dollars.

Poor Michelle Obama doesn't have a clue as to why anyone would call her an "Angry Black Women". Let's see, "For the first time in my adult life I'm proud of my country".

The White House does a "Document Dump" late Friday afternoon with a 3 day weekend on the way. There is evidence in these documents that the White House made sure Solyndra didn't proceed with the layoffs of 200 employees until after the midterm elections in 2010. There is also evidence of some other sketchy loans that will make Solyndra look like chump change! ( You won't hear about this one on NBC, CBS, or ABC)

  The Department of Homeland Security is regularly monitoring social media sites such as "Twitter, Facebook, and MySpace", as well as video and photo sharing sites such as "You Tube, Hulu and Flickr" for "Situational Awareness" to make sure terrorists aren't plotting something using the internet. I wonder if they aren't also monitoring for anything negative being said about BHO, just a thought.

September 21, 2008

O'Bama's Hidden Agenda "SOCIALISM"

I came across a vary curious website when I saw a picture in the September issue of "Townhall Magazine". The picture was of pro-illegal groups in front of San Francisco City Hall protesting against the "Minutemen". One such group was holding up a huge banner stating "No Human Being is Illegal", and the organization was the ISO "the International Socialist Organization". I went to their website and the following is copied right from their site without editing.

THE CASE FOR SOCIALISM

by ALAN MAASS, editor, Socialist Worker

Human need, not corporate greed
"Socialism is based on the idea that we should use the vast resources of society to meet people’s needs.
It seems so obvious--if people are hungry, they should be fed; if people are homeless, we should build homes for them; if people are sick, the best medical care should be available to them. A socialist society would take the immense wealth of the rich and use it to meet the basic needs of all society. The money wasted on weapons could be used to end poverty, homelessness, and all other forms of scarcity. (Sound familiar?)
There’s no blueprint for what a socialist society will look like. That will be determined by the generations to come who are living in one. But it seems obvious that such a society would guarantee every person enough to eat and a sturdy roof over their heads. The education system would be made free--and reorganized so that every child’s ability is encouraged. Health care would be made free and accessible to all, as would all utilities like gas and electricity. Public transportation would also be made free--and more practical and efficient. All of these basic needs would become top priorities.
A socialist society would not only take away the existing wealth of the ruling class, but also its economic control over the world. Under the current system, important economic decisions are left to the chaos of the free market and to the blind competition of capitalists scrambling for profits. Under socialism, the majority of people would plan democratically what to do and how do it."
Social democrats propose selective nationalization of key national industries in mixed economies combined with tax-funded welfare programs..Wikipedia
I can't believe that I am the only person out there
who sees the distinct comparison between the campaign speak of Obama,
and the tenets of socialism!! Joe Biden the other day said that richer
people needed to pay more, that it was PATRIOTIC to do so??? Ok does it
sound like this: "From each according to their ability, to each
according to their need."
That is a direct quote from Karl Marx!!



What appalls me is that NO MSM dare to touch this with a 10 foot pole!! All the scrutiny they have put on Sarah Palin, who has no where near the checkered past of Barack Obama, just shows the bias they have exhibited throughout this entire campaign. Even when Obama puts it right our there to be seen, they turn the other way. In his book, "Dreams From My Father" he spoke of "Frank" who was his mentor in his early teenage years. It has become common knowledge that he is referring to "Frank Marshall Davis". Gerald Horne, a Communist Party historian and contributing editor of Political Affairs, claims that "Frank" was Davis, and further claimed he was a "decisive influence" on Obama, stating "Look, there's one of US influencing the possible next president of the United States", 'US' meaning a Communist. Obama also remembered Frank later in life when he took a job in South Chicago as a community organizer working for a Saul Alinsky based organization when he took some time one day and visited the areas where Frank had lived and wrote in his book "I imagined Frank in a baggy suit and wide lapels, standing in front of the old Regal Theatre, waiting to see Duke or Ella emerge from a gig."

I have just given you 2 names; Frank Marshall Davis and Saul Alinsky. Do the research for yourself, don't take my word for it. Both of these men had strong ties to the Communist Party of the United States of America-CPUSA, and espoused their beliefs. Both of these men had a profound influence over Barack Obama. Here was a young man caught between 2 worlds. His white grandparents were giving him the best private education they could afford. But he was a black man, and was having an identity crisis. He turned to a radical black man who told him "Don't ever trust the white establishment", who told him "You may be a white, well paid nigger, but you're still a nigger just the same"!! Now I don't know about you, but my world view has been strongly influenced by the associations and beliefs I formed in my young adult years. I can't believe that Obama is any different.


Powered by ScribeFire.

September 15, 2008

Why Are There So Many MSM Outlets Attacking Sarah Palin??

Well, I have spent the better part of the past 2 days perusing the various media outlets. I have watched the video of the Gibson interview with Sarah Palin several times. I also found the actual transcripts of the interview and saw how it was edited to make Sarah look like she was: "At times visibly nervous . . . Ms. Palin most visibly stumbled when she was asked by Mr. Gibson if she agreed with the Bush doctrine. Ms. Palin did not seem to know what he was talking about. Mr. Gibson, sounding like an impatient teacher, informed her that it meant the right of 'anticipatory self-defense.' " -- New York Times, Sept. 12

"The New York Times got it wrong. And Charlie Gibson got it wrong. There is no single meaning of the Bush doctrine. In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration -- and the one Charlie Gibson cited is not the one in common usage today". Charles Krauthammer Saturday, September 13, 2008 and he should know according to Wikipedia

I thought that the only truly biased networks were MSNBC & its parent company NBC, but now I know that ALL MAIN STREAM MEDIA is in the tank for Obama!! I have NEVER seen Obama hammered like Gibson did Sarah Palin. Granted, she doesn't have the hardened cynicism of the likes of Joe Biden with 28 years in the senate where he voted 96.6% the same way as his party. And she isn't like the forked tongued, right in your face deceptive B. Hussein Obama. She is a new face on the national scene, but her approval rating in Alaska is over 80%, compared to the 9% approval rating of Congress I'd say she is doing her job a lot better than they are!! It strikes me as unnerving that there has become such scrutiny of Gov. Palin, her family, and her background. Yet no one has ever questioned Obama about his associations, and I don't mean Ayers, and Wright. What about Frank Marshall Davis? The mysterious "Frank" from his book "Dreams from my Father", was his childhood mentor and father figure. Frank was a member of the Communist Party USA, and a subversive wanted by the FBI. BO sat at his feet and listened to his stories. And who in the media has asked the Obama's about "Public Allies"? It's just a little organization that Michelle was executive director of in 1993. Oh yeah, it sounds like a great "Service Organization" on its website, and BO even alludes to it on his website as the model for his "National Service Corps". Problem is folks, and I know some of you BO groupies are too young to even know what I'm about to say, this is all radical, socialist, Marxist rhetoric learned at the feet of Frank Marshall Davis. And one more player is "Saul Alinsky". Good 'ole Saul wrote "Rules for Radicals" in 1971, it is out of print, but you can find chapters of it reprinted on various web sites. B. Hussein Obama is following his plan to gain wide eyed, bushy tailed followers to a T. Our Public Universities have been preaching radical socialism for years. Look at University of Colorado's Ward Churchill, Churchill, in an essay after the Sept. 11 attacks, compared the victims who died at New York City's World Trade Center to the Nazi regime's functionaries. The MSM has become the outlet for the Liberal Elite and now their mission is to take down any opposition to their "Chosen One".

"Many Democrats are clearly itching for the Illinois senator to go at Palin in a meaningful way. The liberal base of the Democratic party detests Palin in a visceral way and wants to destroy her, regardless of whether it is a sound political strategy or not," " Chris Cillizza, author of washingtonpost.com's political blog, The Fix. Even newspapers across the pond have to get their two cents worth in. "John McCain is a boring, warmongering has-been, but Sarah Palin has been the real outrage. How could the greatest power on earth allow this untravelled, snow-flecked, ex-beauty queen, stained with the blood of moose, born again in the Lord, with her teeming family of children with names that sound like dogs, near the nuclear button? According to The TELEGRAPH.co.uk

There are so many websites that have popped up overnight because everyone wants to get in on the act. Ask yourself WHY? Why does the Obama camp need people attacking Sarah Palin, and making up lies, and distorting the truth about her? When you see someone taking down Sarah Palin, ask yourself why? Why hasn't Obama, with everything going for him, been able to seal the deal? It's because most Americans have a feeling in their gut that something just isn't right about this guy, and it has nothing to do with race.